Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2025 15:31:42 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: f45b1d07f50b - main - many: Unsupported Go dep; deprecate and schedule for removal Message-ID: <865xajk7g1.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <wceakxx2qcn7emdctegqu5jbbu3r4qnkv6b6oeidlqow4qjrmb@q7d34lulzm3n> (Mathieu Arnold's message of "Sat, 6 Dec 2025 15:13:37 %2B0100") References: <6932e88b.2dbf8.7aad26de@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <86wm30kbm9.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <oyelznzuwchbobq7xkefddy7b3n25es4dogddsknfrdmmuzxsu@yisge33owzq3> <86pl8rkao8.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <wceakxx2qcn7emdctegqu5jbbu3r4qnkv6b6oeidlqow4qjrmb@q7d34lulzm3n>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> writes: > If you believe there are shortcomings in the framework, the constructive > way to address them is to propose a patch or start a technical > discussion, not to complain without offering a solution. So what would you call deprecating 73 ports without trying to fix them or even just understand why they are the way they are if not “complaining without offering a solution”? I will not let go of this. I understand that you found my response unhelpful, but I also need _you_ to understand how insulting Adam's commit and (especially) email were, and to acknowledge that he acted without prior consultation and summarily dismissed the solution which fuz@ and I suggested because he does not understand the problem space but is convinced that he knows better than 60+ port maintainers. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.orghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?865xajk7g1.fsf>