Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:49:35 -0600 (CST)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Mike Silbersack <silby@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_id.c
Message-ID:  <20080206204812.J41033@odysseus.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <47AA5925.3000008@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200802061540.m16FeXGD030782@repoman.freebsd.org> <47AA5925.3000008@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:

> Mike Silbersack wrote:
>>    Note that this commit does not yet enable random IP ID
>>   generation by default.  There are still some concerns
>>   that doing so will adversely affect performance.
>> 
>
> Random ip_id generation also breaks MANET multicast as it's currently 
> specified -- the ip_id field gets used for histogram based duplicate packet 
> detection. However, after my inveigling, Fred Templin at Boeing brought 
> encapsulation back into the proposal on the table.
>
> So some way to turn this stuff off on a per-interface basis is probably going 
> to be needed later on for mobile stuff...
>
> later
> BMS

Does MANET multicast require:

1) Sequentiality.
or
2) No repetition of an ID within a certain timeframe.

The distinction is quite important!

Mike "Silby" Silbersack



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080206204812.J41033>