Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:47:44 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To:        Pete Fritchman <petef@absolutbsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/irc/irssi Makefile
Message-ID:  <20040105234744.GM9623@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040105190912.2306817D95@sirius.firepipe.net>
References:  <20040105190140.GJ27144@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040105190912.2306817D95@sirius.firepipe.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Pete Fritchman <petef@absolutbsd.org> [040105 11:10] wrote:
> * Mon, 05 Jan 2004 14:01:40 EST - Adam Weinberger:
> | >> (01.05.2004 @ 1347 PST): Pete Fritchman said, in 0.4K: <<
> | >   Modified files:
> | >     irc/irssi            Makefile 
> | >   Log:
> | >   Make WITH_PERL=yes the default, and bump PORTREVISION.  Perl scripting is
> | >   one of the major features of irssi, and seems a reasonable default.
> | 
> | irc/irssi+perl was recent created to provide a perl-enabled irssi. will
> | irc/irssi+perl be removed?
> 
> Didn't notice that.  I think it should -- I cc:'d the maintainers of
> irssi and irssi+perl, what do you guys think?

Removing the irssi+perl port seems like a good idea as it's pretty
redundant now.  And I'm glad that the main line port has Perl
support.

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040105234744.GM9623>