Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:47:44 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@absolutbsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/irc/irssi Makefile Message-ID: <20040105234744.GM9623@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20040105190912.2306817D95@sirius.firepipe.net> References: <20040105190140.GJ27144@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040105190912.2306817D95@sirius.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Pete Fritchman <petef@absolutbsd.org> [040105 11:10] wrote: > * Mon, 05 Jan 2004 14:01:40 EST - Adam Weinberger: > | >> (01.05.2004 @ 1347 PST): Pete Fritchman said, in 0.4K: << > | > Modified files: > | > irc/irssi Makefile > | > Log: > | > Make WITH_PERL=yes the default, and bump PORTREVISION. Perl scripting is > | > one of the major features of irssi, and seems a reasonable default. > | > | irc/irssi+perl was recent created to provide a perl-enabled irssi. will > | irc/irssi+perl be removed? > > Didn't notice that. I think it should -- I cc:'d the maintainers of > irssi and irssi+perl, what do you guys think? Removing the irssi+perl port seems like a good idea as it's pretty redundant now. And I'm glad that the main line port has Perl support. -- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040105234744.GM9623>