Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:10:49 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/64150: [PATCH] ls(1) coredumps when started via execve(2) with no argv. Message-ID: <20040312161049.GA2872@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040312110725.698ebe20@localhost> References: <200403120922.i2C9M0jC002510@stud326.idi.ntnu.no> <20040312104914.GA52099@ip.net.ua> <20040312105730.GA99925@stud326.idi.ntnu.no> <20040312110657.GB52099@ip.net.ua> <20040312111526.GA14260@stack.nl> <20040312125820.GA8574@lum.celabo.org> <20040312154600.GC2235@ip.net.ua> <20040312110725.698ebe20@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 11:07:25AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:46:00 +0200 Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote: [...] > > As Garrett already pointed out in the PR log, have you considered this? > >=20 > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/execve.html#tag= _03_130_08 > >=20 > > I'm happy with changing our behavior to Strictly Conforming for the > > goods of security, and you? >=20 > Will it 'break' anything? >=20 Sure it will, the question is should we care about something that's already broken. ;) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAUeEJUkv4P6juNwoRAt+5AJ9wa4vJpnk0BOBeKCYWj8qSNlIAqACgilE3 5r7hd2MyVutvp5PPX0QXhL0= =iuV5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040312161049.GA2872>