Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:14:07 -0800
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= <maciphone2@googlemail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RPi4 Status and xorg behavior (Mar 5 2021 firmware is bad for USB based booting)
Message-ID:  <B8173862-953B-4561-8C30-23E11FA298C9@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <F811478C-C861-442B-A22F-15FAD33C0581@googlemail.com>
References:  <AAA4E495-4E9E-4C55-A07E-74D9737EC15B@yahoo.com> <20210307155515.GA4591@www.zefox.net> <67BF2EAC-04AD-4822-99B2-48A99563331F@yahoo.com> <G5ZAfvg49jl5dj40HAnjmwoEKpVSuGp8KmiBrSY_EBLXou6UGBIjU3tVxUuPGKeCvXEovg2d3tqhIGOmQCyb7c3wKsUHJ8xrSasvwXfbqwk=@protonmail.com> <4B963C56-D7E9-42FE-8B8B-B8A425ACE78F@yahoo.com> <20210308011035.GA6603@www.zefox.net> <DB3CD5BA-337E-476F-9F0C-C70401F7D800@yahoo.com> <C500EE5B-B483-4580-8C7C-9B9B013D726B@googlemail.com> <20210308173045.GB13739@www.zefox.net> <4D8FD8EE-6642-46ED-8AAE-CAECB36572F6@yahoo.com> <20210309023348.GA16279@www.zefox.net> <EC4C3040-E86A-45EC-9E4F-0E0F81ED3CBD@yahoo.com> <24202B69-A5F2-41CF-A6F4-7113B76B9B0E@yahoo.com> <F811478C-C861-442B-A22F-15FAD33C0581@googlemail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-Mar-10, at 16:16, Klaus K=C3=BCchemann <maciphone2 at =
googlemail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Am 10.03.2021 um 23:28 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm =
<freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>:
>>=20
>> =E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6
>> ..
>> (temporarily where =
https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/tree/master/boot/ =E2=80=A6
>=20
> here too ;-)
>=20
> W A R N I N G=20
>=20
> new CRAPWARE-files from rpi-org-upstream dated Wed, / 10. march 2021/ =
02:36
>=20
> will kill ' powerd' ( at least on my machine ) :
> =E2=80=94 =E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6.
> Starting powerd.
> powerd: no cpufreq(4) support -- aborting: No such file or directory
> /etc/rc: WARNING: failed to start 0.88,  0.38,  0.15    up 0+00:00:59  =
19:38:39
> ...
> --
>=20
> files no further tested because quickly removed from my beautiful =
system :-) Ha Ha=20

I will remind of what the RPi* folks report about using
such github materials (in an raspiOS or raspiOS64 context,
usually via rpi-update use):


=
https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/raspbian/applications/rpi-update=
.md
says . . .

QUOTE
WARNING: Pre-release versions of software are not guaranteed to work. =
You should not use rpi-update on any system unless recommended to do so =
by a Raspberry Pi engineer. It may leave your system unreliable or even =
completely broken. It should not be used as part of any regular update =
process.

. . .

rpi-update will download the latest pre-release version of the linux =
kernel, its matching modules, device tree files, along with the latest =
versions of the VideoCore firmware. It will then install these files to =
relevant locations on the SD card, overwriting any previous versions.=20

All the source data used by rpi-update comes from the GitHub repo =
https://github.com/Hexxeh/rpi-firmware. This repository simply contains =
a subset of the data from the official firmware repository, as not all =
the data from that repo is required.
END QUOTE


https://github.com/Hexxeh/rpi-update says:

QUOTE
This is only intended for use with Raspbian. If you are using a =
different distribution then check with the maintainers if using =
rpi-update is safe.

If the distribution ships a custom kernel (e.g. BerryBoot), then it =
almost certainly is not safe. . . .

Even on Raspbian you should only use this with a good reason.

This gets you the latest bleeding edge kernel/firmware. There is always =
the possibility of regressions.

Bug fixes and improvements will eventually make their way into new =
Raspbian releases and apt-get when they are considered sufficiently well =
tested.

A good reason for using this would be if you like to help with the =
testing effort, and are happy to risk breakages and submit bug reports. =
These testers are welcome.

. . .

Backing up before updating is always advisable.
END QUOTE


FreeBSD's kernel is an example of a "custom kernel", even
more so because they are likely presuming linux.

Releases showing up in "apt-get" are only from some of the
tagged commits, no others.

The RPi*'s release and pre-release criteria do not involve
FreeBSD compatibility in any direct way.

=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B8173862-953B-4561-8C30-23E11FA298C9>