Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:40:15 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> To: current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST] ng_bridge ng_l2tp ng_lmi Message-ID: <20041209124015.GA97077@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041207124154.GA76825@cell.sick.ru> References: <20041202151048.GA33485@cell.sick.ru> <20041207124154.GA76825@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The list of untested nodes has been narrowed down to the following three: ng_bridge, ng_l2tp, ng_lmi Please, if you use one of these three test this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/netgraph_callout T> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:10:48PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> T> Dear collegues, T> T> T> T> we are working on making netgraph ISR mpsafe. To do it we need to T> T> fix all (ab)users of bare timeout(9) in src/sys/netgraph. These T> T> timeout calls are running in synch with netgraph now because timeout(9) T> T> is Giant-locked. As soon as we mark ISR mpsafe, they are going to break. T> T> T> T> This patch semi-mechanically changes all timeout(9) calls to ng_callout(9), T> T> which runs scheduled callouts in netgraph context: T> T> T> T> http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/netgraph_callout T> T> T> T> It can be applied to HEAD or RELENG_5 (not 5.3-RELEASE). It patches T> T> the following nodes: T> T> T> T> ng_bridge.c T> T> ng_l2tp.c T> T> ng_lmi.c T> T> ng_ppp.c T> T> ng_pppoe.c T> T> ng_tty.c T> T> T> T> If you are using at least one of them, then I'm asking you to test the T> T> patch and respond. Thanks in advance! T> T> T> T> P.S. Sorry for crossposting. The target users are both RELENG_5 and CURRENT. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041209124015.GA97077>