Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:48:29 +0000 From: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> To: jamie@catflap.org, imp@bsdimp.com Cc: mjguzik@gmail.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 1 year src-patch anniversary! Message-ID: <202302151448.31FEmT6s025969@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrFRZLeV0qcfGFWZFpn6SXPAYvhOwmWOC2dSGu24LL6=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <202301292218.30TMIQmM020883@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <CAGudoHE8AwfTvWT=65yTgLam5__69Zwtu4_k=p2sNwdLY7_XqQ@mail.gmail.com> <202302151411.31FEBJhh024307@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <CANCZdfrFRZLeV0qcfGFWZFpn6SXPAYvhOwmWOC2dSGu24LL6=w@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > Bugzilla is inefficient for small patches. Yes, I can see that bugzilla is unsuitable for things like that. > I'm trying an experiment on github: any smallish, almost ready patches will > be landed, redirected or rejected quickly Thanks Warner! That sounds great! - I'll be taking you up on that! Another thing - my last port maintainer update was converted to a phabricator post, as was the recent patch that delphij committed. Should I have posted them there instead to save the committers time? I always thought new phabricator posts were for committers only, as it seems to me to be a way for committers to get their code reviewed and passed prior to committing. Cheers, Jamiehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202302151448.31FEmT6s025969>