Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 00:11:44 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> To: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dependency graph? Message-ID: <20140531171144.GA8738@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <538A0630.5050608@qeng-ho.org> References: <20140531065218.GB169@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <538991E0.5000902@FreeBSD.org> <20140531122127.GA4538@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5389D4D8.6060604@qeng-ho.org> <20140531140303.GA6286@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5389F6D8.9010605@qeng-ho.org> <20140531162524.GA8098@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <538A0630.5050608@qeng-ho.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Arthur Chance wrote: > >>> > >>> If there are multiple repositories, whose dependencies will be shown? > >>> What is the choice determined by? > >>> > >>> See below for an example, when I specify a repository and when I don't: > > > > [dd] > > > >>> > >>> Why is "FreeBSD" chosen over "sibptus" when there is no "-r" ? > >>> > >> > >> No idea, but I'd guess it's because the default repo gets priority. > > > > Which repo is the default one and why? > > Again, I'm not an expert but I'd guess it's either an ASCII sort, so > FreeBSD comes before any lower case repo name, or whatever order the > repo files appear in the directories. I don't have the bandwidth to read > the code right now though. You could try renaming "sibptus" to "A" and > see if it takes precedence. Repo names seem to be entirely arbitrary. Such things should be documented. I think all the multirepo thing is very incomplete and rudimentary. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140531171144.GA8738>