Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 22:15:46 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Final request for help with release. (DPT boot floppy) Message-ID: <199708220415.WAA07265@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970821172643.11040C-100000@misery.sdf.com> References: <199708212322.RAA06634@rocky.mt.sri.com> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970821172643.11040C-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > And then I'll just go back to solaris which works :) > > > > And is slower than a dog. I guess you'd need that RAID system to get > > decent I/O performance out of it. :) :) > > According to a simple test with dd that I ran on the identical hardware > with 2.2-stable and Solaris 2.5.1 x86, the performance results are > basically the same. What kind of performance tests? Dhrystone and Whetstone's will be exactly the same since it's the same hardware, but I'd be suprised if networking, I/O, and load performance were even close to the same. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708220415.WAA07265>