Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:41:31 +0200 From: Siegbert Baude <siegbert.baude@gmx.de> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default ssh protocol in -STABLE [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD-STABLE now has OpenSSH 3.4p1] Message-ID: <3D25DA4B.7060703@gmx.de> References: <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020705073043.01c52198@192.168.0.12> <xzphejepfd7.fsf_-_@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav schrieb: > [moving from -stable to -security, bcc: to -stable and security-team] > > Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes: > >>As a lot has changed with OpenSSH in FreeBSD, perhaps now is a good >>time to make the 2,1 the default instead ? > > > I'd like that. I think the only reason for the old default was not to > surprise users who had the ssh1 RSA host key in their known_hosts but > not the ssh2 DSA host key. > > What do people think about this? Keep 2,1 or revert to 1,2? My opinion is: Go for the change, there will pass a long time until this opportunity will come again. But then, I only have to support 100 clients. The people with really big crowds to support may think different. Ciao Siegbert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D25DA4B.7060703>