Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:20:40 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Janos Mohacsi <mohacsi@niif.hu> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, kjc@csl.sony.co.jp Subject: Re: TCP ECN merge possible from ALTQ? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021121142001.97258R-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20021121095741.C48490-100000@evil.ki.iif.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Drop Jonathan Lemon an e-mail. One of the items in our contract with him was to cover a TCP ECN implementation. That said, ECN has generated a fair amount of controversy. We do support some ECN stuff for IPsec tunnels already. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Janos Mohacsi wrote: > Hello to all, > > Is it possible to merge from ALTQ the TCP_ECN part to the > FreeBSD-current later to FreeBSD-stable? > > Luigi I have seen your and Alfred Perlstein comments on TCP SACK. > What do you think about TCP_ECN? Is it worth including in the FreeBSD? > According to measurement of Sally Floyd, It is worth using it. > What do you think merging to -current? > Best Regards, > Janos Mohacsi > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021121142001.97258R-100000>