Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:00:42 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: des@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: PAM question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302211256090.51164-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp8yw9s747.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So I see we seem to ahve two sets of PAM code, and pam_unix.c exists in both of them. What is teh situation with this.? As a PAM nega_expert (xp--) I'm confused. One of our custommers wants to install pam_tally but I see that it was removed a few years ago.. Why was it removed? did it not work? does it work? Does the fact that it is in contrib/lib/libpam mean it won't work with lib/libpam....? Inquiring minds want to know.. also: Are there any good references on the state of play with PAM? e.g. that explains why we have 2 sets of it etc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0302211256090.51164-100000>