Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Feb 2025 16:19:39 +0100
From:      Nico Sonack <nsonack@herrhotzenplotz.de>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Issues with iwlwifi with WPA2/EAP-PEAP on an Intel AX211
Message-ID:  <2100299.x0N0T6uNKo@triton>
In-Reply-To: <01843106-q806-1sn0-22sp-qo650s48q868@SerrOFQ.bet>
References:  <tklsg6a4n5mbj4y5taitz7gclnhavo7vrb26atk77kqnvnmujh@hwkallxwn5jb> <01843106-q806-1sn0-22sp-qo650s48q868@SerrOFQ.bet>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Wednesday, 5 February 2025 14:25:01 CET Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > wpa_supplicant:
> >    wpa_supplicant[36003]: bsd_set_key: unknown alg=4
> 
> alg=4 would be WPA_ALG_BIP_CMAC_128 which is in in the file:
> 
>      384         case WPA_ALG_BIP_CMAC_128:
>      385                 wk.ik_type = IEEE80211_CIPHER_BIP_CMAC_128;
>      386                 break;
>      387         default:
> 
> so I am a bit confused as to why it would log the default case below.
> Oh, this is main where Adrian has added the placeholders.  Let me check
> stable/14.  Yepp, there they are not avail and the deault printf is
> expected.
Urgh yes, that is a good point. I have experimented here before and applied 
https://reviews.freebsd.org/rG05540e62e75f8b2de7e337738eacfb0b159515a6 without 
reverting the change. I am going to revert this change and recompile the 
kernel.

I am going to test this tomorrow since this is my workstation at $WORK.

N.B.: The kernel here is a GENERIC kernel with TCP-RACK enabled and other very 
unrelated patches to the userland. Also, I'm running wpa_supplicant-devel 
(quarterly) as it seems to be behaving better than the one in base.

> Can you actually add proto=WPA2 as indicated in the Subject line and see
> what happens?
I did this and interestingly it did change some behaviour (stuff started just 
hanging instead of just taking the interface down immediately).

> > 
> > Note that iwm seems to not be supported with this chipset (unless I'm
> > totally wrong here).
> No.  iwm doesn't support that card anymore but that's likely not related
> to this issue anyway.
Good!

Nico

-- 
Nico Sonack <nsonack@herrhotzenplotz.de>




home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2100299.x0N0T6uNKo>