Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 06:08:30 -0700 From: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Dmitry Pryanishnikov <lynx.ripe@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-10:05.opie Message-ID: <AANLkTiliHwEFqS0QNboZILHMdYlgitWpYL_M8i3fiwJC@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86d3wh3aie.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <201005270325.o4R3P7Bj009279@freefall.freebsd.org> <AANLkTikHAZTCgc4R8AsTKFlcWXLXUF_aLGoySmP3kjyt@mail.gmail.com> <86d3wh3aie.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
PAM opie implementation was careful enough not triggering this issue. So no, programs using solely PAM, configured or not configured with OPIE, are not affected. Programs that links directly to OPIE may be affected, depending on their usage. On May 27, 2010 3:30 AM, "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <des@des.no> wrote: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <lynx.ripe@gmail.com> writes: > Wouldn't just commenting out all references t... With my PAM maintainer hat on: yes. I'm surprised secteam didn't bother to ask me. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTiliHwEFqS0QNboZILHMdYlgitWpYL_M8i3fiwJC>