Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:59:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Marcin Dalecki <mdcki@gmx.net> Cc: Freebsd Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309231656470.26876-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3F70ADA1.6020907@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > > > I'm perfectly happy to support the libkse->libpthread switch, and I'm > > perfectly happy to support making libpthread be the default threading > > library. But, I strongly believe that we need to also treat -pthread > > sanely. > > You have to decide what the therading lib should be indeed. > However recent expirence shows that a 1:n model seems to be the > one the world over you is gearing around: Linux never did anything else. > Windows anyway. Solaris switched from n:m to 1:n on the step between > version 8 and 9.... Having two of them isn't the solution for me as a developer > since I'm simply not interresed in debugging both cases. This is a reason why -pthread shouldn't imply linking to any one library. If you only want to deal with libthr or libthread (KSE in 1:1 mode), then you are free to choose them and only them. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10309231656470.26876-100000>