Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:49:23 -0600
From:      seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach)
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: if_fxp - the real point 
Message-ID:  <200103301749.f2UHnNK02853@guild.plethora.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:03:23 EST." <5.0.0.25.0.20010330123625.03db9610@mail.etinc.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <5.0.0.25.0.20010330123625.03db9610@mail.etinc.com>, Dennis writes:
[snip]

Dennis, everything you're saying sounds exactly like the people who were
saying, five or ten years ago, that Linux would *never* make *any* difference,
because Microsoft had already won.

If there is a measurable population of people to whom open specs are
important, open specs are a competitive advantage.  Over time, they are
likely to win if all else is equal... and in the long run, all else *is*
equal.

Is General Motors worried about using a card for which the drivers require
an NDA?  No.  Is Home Depot, who are running a lot of boxes on Linux, more
likely to standardize on a few thousand cards that their programmers assure
them are "safer for us"?  Yes.

The pressure need not be overwhelming to be real.  Over time, yes, I expect
to see more vendors release hardware specs, because failure to do so can cost
them *at least some* sales.  The number of sales seems to be steadily going
up.  It can be very small today and still be a big deal in five years.

-s

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103301749.f2UHnNK02853>