Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 10:20:56 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Still IRQ routing problems with bridged devices. Message-ID: <XFMail.20040106102056.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040105233138.GR17023@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05-Jan-2004 Bernd Walter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 04:24:27PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <20040105231533.GQ17023@cicely12.cicely.de> >> Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes: >> : The point is that it shouldn't take an IRQ for PCI which is configured >> : for an ISA device in device.hints. >> >> We don't do that. > > We do! > > /boot/device.hints: > hint.sio.0.irq="4" > > pci_cfgintr_virgin: using routable interrupt 4 > pci_cfgintr: 0:4 INTD routed to irq 4 No, I'm saying (as I said earlier) "we don't use any intelligence to avoid ISA interrupts in our virgion interrupt algorithm". -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20040106102056.jhb>