Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:11:01 +0100 From: phk@phk.freebsd.dk To: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic with heavy io Message-ID: <50895.1044969061@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:34:51 %2B0100." <20030211113451.GA2305@laptop.6bone.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030211113451.GA2305@laptop.6bone.nl>, Mark Santcroos writes: >596: DEV_STRATEGY(bp); > >I don't understand what you want me to examine there as the arguments are >not usefull anymore (or are they?). Well that line in my copy was not code, so I just wanted to see what your sources said. >> >#15 0xc01edc7b in spec_specstrategy (ap=0x0) at ../../../fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:633 >> >> This, I think is impossible, so I think we should assume that something >> overwrite some memory and cleared out some bits which should have >> survived. > >That was my feeling too, it wouldn't have gotten so deep with NULL arguments. >Haven't checked the code so it is only an assumption. > >Any idea's what to do now or what to do when I am able to reproduce it? No idea at the moment. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50895.1044969061>