Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:35:20 +0300 From: "Alexandros Kosiaris" <akosiaris@gmail.com> To: "Giorgos Keramidas" <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Securelevels and /dev/io documentation inconsistency Message-ID: <cee728a70607121035k39efb17co41825fb18674b176@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060712141153.GB30855@gothmog.pc> References: <cee728a70607120547q51b3e45flfe22716fd28b8c83@mail.gmail.com> <20060712141153.GB30855@gothmog.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It looks like it does. Would something like this be satisfactory? > > 1 Secure mode - the system immutable and system > append-only flags may not be turned off; disks for > mounted file systems, /dev/mem and /dev/kmem may not be > opened for writing and /dev/io (if your platform has it) > may not be opened at all; kernel modules (see kld(4)) > may not be loaded or unloaded. > > Regards, > Giorgos > Yes it would be. Thank you.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cee728a70607121035k39efb17co41825fb18674b176>