Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 11:41:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: dg@root.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should FreeBSD-3.0 ship with RFC 1644 (T/TCP) turned off by Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980906113956.14431A-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> In-Reply-To: <199809060656.XAA13597@usr01.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 6 Sep 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Ugh... really? I use Livingston Portmaster's and FreeBSD heavily. > > > > > > Be aware that (depending on the model) Portmasters have had a long > > >history, and some sites are still running 4 year old firmware on them. > > >Always get the ComOS version. > > > > Terry's assertion about the Livingston being broken is the first I've > > seen. Previously all of the reports of brokeness were with Annex terminal > > servers. > > You should subscribe to the portmaste-users list. I'm on it. > Basically, if you are running old code, you are at risk. What is old code? You stated before that all Portmasters were affected. I've never heard that _any_ version of ComOS has problems with TCP extensions is affected actually. > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980906113956.14431A-100000>