Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:25:31 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> To: "O'Connor, Daniel" <Daniel.O'Connor@emc.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_pflow from OpenBSD Message-ID: <20150109142531.573303b0@mr185083> In-Reply-To: <3E1BDE12-9A82-4849-AC52-A155C613C1A1@emc.com> References: <45056363-1E83-4318-B870-7F673993166B@emc.com> <20150108101744.2c2a9eae@mr185083> <9085F2E7-5429-4C16-86DB-7C3F04C993DC@emc.com> <20150109110207.45e280dd@mr185083> <3E1BDE12-9A82-4849-AC52-A155C613C1A1@emc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Fri, 9 Jan 2015 08:09:21 -0500, "O'Connor, Daniel" <Daniel.O'Connor@emc.com> a écrit : Hello, > > wrote: pflow(4) has the drawback to handle netflow only at the end > > of the session. > > Hmm, really? I looked at the code and it does have timeouts to emit > things, but perhaps I am misreading it. I believed that too but : http://misc.openbsd.narkive.com/pS5VJOyH/pflow-packets-before-state-expires See the Henning Brauer reply. Regards,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150109142531.573303b0>