Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 04:13:36 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Matt Douhan <mdouhan@fruitsalad.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: tcl8.4 Message-ID: <20030706111336.GA18667@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200307061057.09092.mdouhan@fruitsalad.org> References: <3F0768D7.8020402@swbell.net> <3F07B0BC.4030502@swbell.net> <20030706052044.GA16999@rot13.obsecurity.org> <200307061057.09092.mdouhan@fruitsalad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Matt Douhan wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > On Sunday 06 July 2003 07.20, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > OK, thanks for clarifying. Assuming that tcl8.4 is considered by the > > developers to be the current "stable" release (which I think it is), > > we should indeed try to migrate 8.3 ports to 8.4. Some of them will > > probably require changes. Would you be able to work on this? >=20 > when migrating these ports, is it prerred to email the patches to the=20 > maintainer or to send-pr them, or whats the preferred procedure? >=20 > I have done expect and mysqltcl and are working on the others If there's a maintainer, email them for review (they may ask you to submit a PR with the patch and a note that there is maintainer approval). If not, then just send-pr directly. Kris --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/CARgWry0BWjoQKURAhiDAKCllr/u00/oxWpYsMpFGSOoBa5flACgikkp auH5n0ZlMFG6w8JHRDngOjQ= =nrrP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030706111336.GA18667>