Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 14:30:49 +0530 From: Alwin Doss <alwindoss@outlook.com> To: FreeBSD Database <freebsd-database@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: FreeBSD's very own desktop environment Message-ID: <BAY002-W16A44E85B02C16EBDA3C43AA890@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <BAY002-W16768FCDE9171D61FF3643AA890@phx.gbl> References: <BAY002-W16768FCDE9171D61FF3643AA890@phx.gbl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Users, Please ignore my earlier email to the mailing list freebsd-database@freebsd.org, it was intended for freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Sorry for the spam regards, alwin From: alwindoss@outlook.com To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD's very own desktop environment Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 14:20:07 +0530 Hi All, Having a good weekend??? Let me not make it boring I will get straight to the point. I have read in FreeBSD documentation, while comparing with the Linux kernel we claim FreeBSD to be a complete operating system which provides not just the kernel but also other utilies surrounding the kernel making it a complete operating system. My question is "Why doesn't FreeBSD have it's own desktop environment" something like what Ubuntu Linux is trying to achieve with their Unity Desktop environment. In doing so we will carve a niche for ourselves in the end user space. What does the forum have to say about this? Regards, Alwinhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY002-W16A44E85B02C16EBDA3C43AA890>