Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:33:13 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf kern.post.mk Message-ID: <20050913153313.q2hwaarrk8cwckkg@netchild.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20050913125820.GA10663@FreeBSD.org> References: <20050911002229.51F4916A471@hub.freebsd.org> <432382BC.5080105@root.org> <200509110310.36423@harrymail> <43255152.3000609@freebsd.org> <20050912165518.GA94181@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050913125820.GA10663@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > AFAIK, we still do not turn softupdates on /, but do on other > partitions. With your proposed idea, softupdates should be on on /. > How safe is this today? The reason why we don't enable SU on / is that an installworld may fail on a filled up FS even when it would succeed in a SU disabled environment. This *may* not be case anymore since someone changed some internal behavior (you will see instant updates in df instead of delayed ones since 5.x), but this is pure speculation, I don't know for sure. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 Nobody wants constructive criticism. It's all we can do to put up with constructive praise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050913153313.q2hwaarrk8cwckkg>