Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 16:32:14 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@rover.village.org> To: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org> Cc: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shared libraries? Message-ID: <E0x4D6t-000624-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Aug 1997 11:46:54 PDT." <199708281846.LAA10799@hokkshideh.jetcafe.org> References: <199708281846.LAA10799@hokkshideh.jetcafe.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199708281846.LAA10799@hokkshideh.jetcafe.org> Dave Hayes writes: : Correct me if I am wrong (and you most undoubtedly will), but isn't : this counter-intuitive to almost every other architechure out there? Generally, on most architectures PIC code is slower than non-PIC code. At least on sparc, 68k, mips and alpha (as well as x86). The generally quoted number is 10%. That's what various docs that I've seen over the years have quoted. That's one reason why many benchmarks are done with static binaries... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0x4D6t-000624-00>