Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 20:58:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229235] vt(4) of 11.2-RELEASE is broken with hardware dependent problem. Message-ID: <bug-229235-227-a2M5ikUH8I@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-229235-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-229235-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229235 Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |portmaster@bsdforge.com --- Comment #2 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- The same is also often true for Nvidia cards -- no matter the age. So as a rule I _always_ include sc(4) in my KERNCONF. I'm also not terribly excited about the overall output/capabilities of vt(4) aside from the more easily achieved resolution, and refresh rates. It doesn't play well with my editor(s), nor can I copy/paste. The buffering is lacking... But I have nothing to bring to the table to improve things. So I can't *really* complain. I just use sc(4). :-) I might also add; I applaud the efforts to accomplish as much as *was* accomplished with vt(4). It isn't an easy task. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-229235-227-a2M5ikUH8I>