Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:09:00 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste, current@FreeBSD.org, Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Julien Laffaye <jlaffaye@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] pkgng alpha2 Message-ID: <20111215020900.5a4f6dd1@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE791B5.6070808@FreeBSD.org> References: <4ED692D2.5060407__42524.3372716524$1322686982$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org> <4EE78889.10500@FreeBSD.org> <4EE789E6.5020303@freebsd.org> <4EE791B5.6070808@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/9RAG1f/dH57iRfu8w/DcdSc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:56:05 +0200 Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > on 13/12/2011 19:22 Julien Laffaye said the following: > > On 12/13/2011 06:16 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 30/11/2011 22:32 Julien Laffaye said the following: > >>> [1] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues > >>> [2] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng > >>> [3] : http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng > >>> [4] : http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pkgng-bsdcan2011.pdf > >>> [5] : > >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/201110DevSummit/Ports?action=3DAttachFile&do= =3Dget&target=3Dpkgng-devsummit.pdf > >>> > >>> > >>> [6] : > >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/201110DevSummit?action=3DAttachFile&do=3Dget&= target=3Dpkgng-devsummit-track.pdf > >>> > >> Couple of questions/suggestions: > >> > >> 1. Do you plan to have a pkgng port to issue the preview releases > >> pkgng? Current pkgng installation/bootstrap procedure is really > >> easy, but the port would be even more convenient for prospective > >> testers. > > Yes, this is planned. The ports will bootstrap pkgng. >=20 > Great! The current idea is to have everything in ports so that we don't depend on the base OS for any kind of changes; we'll only have a bootstrap in base. One more step forward to decoupling ports from src releases. > >> 2. Is there a public pre-built package repository with > >> pkgng-format packages that could be used for testing and getting a > >> taste of a packages-only pkgng-managed system? > > Unfortunately, no. > > I think I now have the resources to do that for the next CFT. But > > it will only be 9.0 amd64 I am afraid. > > We cant build packages for the entire matrix. >=20 > I understand. Those would take an immense amount of compilation time > and storage space. Storage and especially storage / propagation to mirrors are the biggest problems. After pkgNG goes in, we plan to switch HEAD to it and provide only pkgNG packages for it; then probably the same for 9-STABLE and further 9 releases, but we'll probably need to provide current style of pacakges during 9.x life time :( --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/9RAG1f/dH57iRfu8w/DcdSc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7pOqUACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeUH/ACcC2q34MzpSxlYA3qfsfa0UIK8 XAoAnjlMaPpFmFo7wsnru+FZkpT921ng =wcAt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/9RAG1f/dH57iRfu8w/DcdSc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111215020900.5a4f6dd1>