Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:31:05 +0200
From:      "Per Claesson" <per@visimedia.com>
To:        <security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Patch problem
Message-ID:  <01d301c12cba$2f804840$0200a8c0@priya>
References:  <E15aIrX-0001Ur-00@xi.css.qmw.ac.uk><Your message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2001 23:36:47 %2B0800." <3.0.32.20010824233647.0076a230@smtp.magix.com.sg> <5.1.0.14.0.20010824115419.05759280@marble.sentex.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
When trying to install the latest tcp-wrappers patch I get the following =
message:

# patch -p < patches/tcp_wrappers.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- contrib/tcp_wrappers/socket.c      2000/09/25 00:41:55     1.5
|+++ contrib/tcp_wrappers/socket.c      2001/07/04 20:16:18     1.6
--------------------------
File to patch:

What should I do?

/Per Claesson

VisiMedia
S=E4teriv=E4gen 11
270 33 Vollsj=F6
Tel 0416-300 07, 070 99 22 55 9
Fax 0416-300 03
www.visimedia.com

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net>
To: "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.org>
Cc: <security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: Updating Sendmail=20


> At 09:40 AM 8/24/01 -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> >At 09:27 AM 8/24/2001, David Pick wrote:
> >
> > >Sorry, I think (now) Brett was asking how to build sendmail
> > >*as included in the base OS* without doing a full OS build.
> > >I don't know the answer to that one.
> >
> >The other thing I don't want to do is clobber vital files on
>=20
>=20
> Just a thought and not sure if it will work.  But what about nfs =
mounting=20
> /usr/src and /usr/obj from another upto date machine.
> cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail
> make depend
> make
> make install
>=20
>=20
>          ---Mike
>=20
>=20
> >a working server or take the server down for very long. Installing
> >Sendmail from scratch, or even rebuilding it, could clobber the
> >.mc, .cf, aliases, et cetera. (Yes, I plan to back these up, but
> >it'd be nice if there were an upgrade procedure that would eliminate
> >the need for this.) It'd be nice to replace the binary, kill the
> >task, restart, and go... nice and quick, so that users don't
> >notice and no mail is lost or delayed appreciably.
> >
> >--Brett
> >
> >
> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
>=20
>=20
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
>=20


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01d301c12cba$2f804840$0200a8c0>