Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:05:53 +0300 From: "Vlad GALU" <dudu@dudu.ro> To: "Jeff Roberson" <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0 Message-ID: <ad79ad6b0707170105n46b4c4f2s682a5d61e6b72895@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1> References: <20070716233030.D92541@10.0.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/17/07, Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ule.diff > > This patch is scheduled for inclusion in 7.0. I would like anyone who > cares to run it to validate that it does not create any stability or > performance regression over the existing ULE. This patch replaces ULE > with SCHED_SMP, which will now no longer exist as a seperate fork of ULE. > > Briefly, this is still a very suitable scheduler for uniprocessor machines > while providing stronger affinity and other performance improvements for > multiprocessor machines. > > Even "works for me!" type responses are welcome so I know roughly how many > people have tested before I commit this close to release. "Works for me!" :) It survived a couple of buildworlds, while I was doing my usual work. This is an UP amd64 machine. > > Thanks! > Jeff > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ad79ad6b0707170105n46b4c4f2s682a5d61e6b72895>