Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:52:05 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, kib@freebsd.org Subject: Re: posix_fallocate(2) && posix_fadvise(2) are somewhat broken Message-ID: <868u55rl96.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <CAH7qZfvV-RepAc6N0UxFi2RBthxrd%2BqHD-Qh5dc-9v=NFGCy_w@mail.gmail.com> (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Tue, 8 Dec 2015 01:35:31 -0800") References: <CAH7qZfvV-RepAc6N0UxFi2RBthxrd%2BqHD-Qh5dc-9v=NFGCy_w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Hi, while working on some unrelated feature I've noticed that at least > those two system calls are not returning proper value (-1) on error. > Instead actual errno value is returned from the syscall verbatim, > i.e. posix_fadvise() returns 22 on EINVAL. That's how syscalls work. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868u55rl96.fsf>