Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:06:03 +0100 From: Steven Hartland <steven.hartland@multiplay.co.uk> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>, Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org> Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r297789 - stable/10/bin/csh Message-ID: <570BD97B.8090401@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVe%2BD9ce3-4kbpYusrxpiaJRKbXpr_Wzr5s55S5V8Ngrzw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201604101812.u3AIC41m002710@repo.freebsd.org> <CAG=rPVe%2BD9ce3-4kbpYusrxpiaJRKbXpr_Wzr5s55S5V8Ngrzw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/04/2016 17:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org > <mailto:mp@freebsd.org>> wrote: > > Author: mp > Date: Sun Apr 10 18:12:04 2016 > New Revision: 297789 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/297789 > > Log: > MFC 297673: > > Revert r296969 by removing SAVESIGVEC and switching to fork > instead. This > fixes usage with system libraries which maintain their own > signal state. > > PR: 208132 > > > I'm not sure, but it looks like this might have fixed some tests which > were failing for the past month. > Should this go into 10.3 as an Errata Notice? I think it was pulled from 10.3?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?570BD97B.8090401>