Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 14:16:18 +1000 (EST) From: Gary Roberts <garyr@amor.wcs.uq.edu.au> To: eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stable config broken? Message-ID: <199806090416.OAA01476@amor.wcs.uq.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <19980608144734.58881@follo.net> from Eivind Eklund at "Jun 8, 98 02:47:34 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eivind Eklund writes :- > > GENERIC:31: unknown option "COMPAT_43" > > GENERIC:28: unknown option "MSDOSFS" > > GENERIC:27: unknown option "NFS" > > GENERIC:26: unknown option "FFS" > > GENERIC:25: unknown option "INET" > > This is not dangerous - it is just warning messages (which should be > considered as scary in -current, but not in -stable - not all options > have been made 'known' in -stable). Is it really true that all these options that we've known and loved for years are truly deprecated?? They used to be `known' or were we just fooling ourselves?? Is this documented anywhere? For instance, quoting from the current LINT (2.2.6-RELEASE) # One of these is mandatory: options FFS #Fast filesystem options NFS #Network File System How can you describe them as not `known'?? Cheers, -- Gary Roberts (garyr@wcs.uq.edu.au) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806090416.OAA01476>