Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:41:42 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> Subject: Re: device sio vs. device uart Message-ID: <200506211541.43452.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200506101356.50355@harrymail> References: <200506101356.50355@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 10 June 2005 07:56 am, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Originally I posted this to questions@ but got no answer so I'd like to ask > here: > > Hello, > > after compiling a custom kernel with device uart instead of device sio I > see the following in my boot message: > sio0 failed to probe at port 0x3f8 irq 4 on isa0 > sio1 failed to probe at port 0x2f8 irq 3 on isa0 > sio2: not probed (disabled) > sio3: not probed (disabled) > > But I don't have sio in my kernel at all. > > Can someone please explain me the major differences (besides the newbus > adaption) between sio and uart? And why is sio still in GENERIC? > And of course why do I see these sio messages? > > Thanks in advance, I won't get into sio vs uart, but you will need to remove all of your 'sio' hints from device.hints to make the sio devices go away. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506211541.43452.jhb>