Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it (Luigi Rizzo) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Will the TEE function of IPFW be ever implemented/necessary ? Message-ID: <199809102100.OAA08706@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199809090541.HAA17889@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> from Luigi Rizzo at "Sep 9, 98 07:41:23 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo writes: > > > > I'd prefer that someone implemented it, because a few people have > > > > asked for it, but on the other hand if no one is even going to implement > ... > > Well, all I can say is that I don't know what people might want > > to use it for, but people always seem to find a way to suprise us > > but you said a few people have asked for it! so what they want it for... I don't know... they just asked about it. :-) > > I'm just making this up and it's not a great example, but my point > > is that it's not for you or me to decide that there are no applications > > except for a very tiny detail... who is going to write this code :) but > let's do as you suggest, and leave it alone... it's just about ten > lines of useless code after all :) I plead guilty for never getting around to implementing it. It's still somewhere on my list tho' .. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809102100.OAA08706>