Date: 14 Jun 2003 09:23:01 -0400 From: "Brandon S. Allbery " KF8NH <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: peter lageotakes <plageotakes@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: cvsup with tag=. on src and upgrading (in general) Message-ID: <1055596981.57938.21.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net> In-Reply-To: <xzpwufo6bjr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030614031557.94662.qmail@web14603.mail.yahoo.com> <1055561339.57938.1.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net> <xzpwufo6bjr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 09:20, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Brandon S. Allbery " KF8NH <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> writes: > > No, it means that there are no tag values that are meaningful for > > ports-all; you need to use tag=. (no tag, meaning retrieve the HEAD) > > "tag=." is not "no tag", it is a magic tag which gives you the top of > the trunk. No tag at all gives you the version control files. I was speaking in terms of CVS tags, not of cvsup's tag=; cvsup's behavior with respect to tag= had already been described. -- brandon s allbery [openafs/solaris/japh/freebsd] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [linux/heimdal/too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university [better check the oblivious first -ke6sls]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1055596981.57938.21.camel>