Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:22:46 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: deperlifying sockstat(1) Message-ID: <77484.1020316966@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 May 2002 22:15:08 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205012206440.75286-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205012206440.75286-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju lian Elischer writes: >> In message <xzp8z73pjh6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >> >I'm working on a C version of sockstat(1), and to complete it I need >> >to do nasty stuff like using libkvm and defining _KERNEL before >> >including some headers (see fstat). I'm starting to think that it >> >would be easier to just make a kern.sockstat sysctl node, and make >> >sockstat(1) a #!/bin/sh wrapper around sysctl(8). Ideas? >> >> sysctl is way better than libkvm because it provides a chance >> for presentation. > >unless sockstat gets a -N -M capacity such as teh other similar programs.. The ratio of -N -M use to normal use is so low that it is no justification for creating a setuid program for the normal case. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?77484.1020316966>