Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:29:10 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm@inbox.lv> Subject: Re: x11-wm/xwmm [WAS: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder] Message-ID: <200405142129.10156.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <40A50E0A.6060405@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200405141700.i4EH0gSp024041@freefall.freebsd.org> <200405141036.12208.ringworm@inbox.lv> <40A50E0A.6060405@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 14 May 2004 21:20, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > ===> xwmm-0.7_1 depends on shared library: qt2.4 - not found
> > ===> Verifying install for qt2.4 in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt23
> > ===> Vulnerability check disabled
> >
> > NOTICE
> >
> > You have QT3 files installed! Installing this port
> > will result in conflicts between QT3 and QT2!
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /speed/usr.ports/x11-toolkits/qt23.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /speed/usr.ports/x11-wm/xwmm.
> > mike:/usr/ports/x11-wm/xwmm>
> >
> >
> > My question is, should a PR be submitted requesting this port be
> > dropped? I know I don't want QT2 on my system and assume most
> > others feel the same way. If a PR is appropriate to request this
> > port be dropped I'll be happy to submit it.
>
> This would be a request to drop x11-toolkits/qt23 and dependent
> ports, which you should discuss on kde@ first.
kde@ no longer maintain qt23 &c.
As far as we are concerned, it's orphaned, and if someone else wants to
maintain it they can.
Regards,
Andy
(one of kde@)
--
Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk
| tap@kde.org
"In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org
we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405142129.10156.andy>