Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:42:29 +0000
From:      Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Discussion on the future of floppies in 5.x and 6.x
Message-ID:  <20040108164228.GS8322@submonkey.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040108163647.GR8322@submonkey.net>
References:  <20040107235737.I32227@pooker.samsco.home> <20040108163647.GR8322@submonkey.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--//h4sZKAxcnndsN6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:36:47PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:35:01AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > All,
> >=20
> > Every FreeBSD release cycle in the past year has hit bumps due to insta=
ll
> > floppy problems.  This is becoming more and more of a burden on the
> > Release Engineering Team, as we simply do not have the resources to
> > constantly battle the floppies.
>=20
> Floppies can go as far as I'm concerned, with the one proviso that we
> start shipping a /boot.config containing '-P'.  Without floppies, the
> only ways to do a headless install are PXE and cutting your own release
> with that /boot.config in place, and not all machines can do PXE.

Actually, I'd like to go one further and suggest that we do this anyway.

Ceri

--=20

--//h4sZKAxcnndsN6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE//Yh0ocfcwTS3JF8RAppGAJ9+ryNvknkTBrSBqJoX/VSOSRDaoACcDGXk
IO70VmykLiQqMoUmSkFBRaU=
=mBKY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--//h4sZKAxcnndsN6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040108164228.GS8322>