Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:07:22 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: amd64 Linux Test Project failures Message-ID: <20061230120722.GA36814@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0612291424g4ecbd088i7846d248851b3e63@mail.gmail.com> References: <790a9fff0612290911t5ae69715gd2bf0dda0f9228f2@mail.gmail.com> <20061229213509.GA86839@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0612291424g4ecbd088i7846d248851b3e63@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I just added another %p to the format, here are my results with all of
> the debugging printfs.
>
> Dec 29 15:32:38 hp010 kernel: linux(1807): access(Checking if path
> [0xffffffffffffffff/0xffffffffa3bc8be0/0x28069000] exists) <-
> &args-path, args-path
the access03 test passes 0 as the path address. interesting that it
gets this non-0 address. is the address consistent among runs?
I wonder if glibc mangles it somehow (it shouldnt but you never know)
can you try simple program like
main()
{
access(0, 0);
}
and show its output?
roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061230120722.GA36814>