Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 09:26:39 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkern.a going away Message-ID: <13141.819966399@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Dec 1995 20:29:25 %2B1100." <199512260929.UAA29379@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm about to nuke libkern.a to ensure that all objects are compiled with
> the correct ${CFLAGS}. This will also ensure that all objects are
> compiled with the same <sys> and <machine> directories. Objects that
> are currently in the library will be specified by putting their sources
> in files.${MACHINE}. The set of necessary objects has to be machine-
> dependent to save space but kernel-independent so that lkms can depend
> on all the necessary functions being present.
>
> Does anyone want to do this better or differently?
Please go ahead. Long overdue.
Should we add a semi-mandatory kernel option "GCC" which pulls in the
stuff gcc needs ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13141.819966399>