Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:06:36 +0100 From: Joerg Pernfuss <elessar@bsdforen.de> To: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects Message-ID: <20061030030636.66af0924@loki.starkstrom.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061030024358.39a12359@loki.starkstrom.lan> References: <20061029222847.GA68272@marvin.astase.com> <20061030003628.42bc5f8d@loki.starkstrom.lan> <00f201c6fbb6$0c6bd150$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20061030024358.39a12359@loki.starkstrom.lan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:43:58 +0100
Joerg Pernfuss <elessar@bsdforen.de> wrote:
> That would mean that `rm -P <file>' with <file> having a link count of
> at least 2, would behave like `rm <file>' (and like Romain suggested).
Correction after some `read the frakkin code':
if (sbp->st_nlink > 1) {
warnx("%s (inode %u): not overwritten due to multiple links",
file, sbp->st_ino);
return (0);
The link is removed, the file is not overwritten and a warning is generated.
Joerg
--
| /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a |
| \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 |
| X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. |
| / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. |
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFRV4tH31s/bvKrSQRAs0oAJ44a4wPbXkdB2Ueie0dxuyCIAKGBwCfbrGo
7ZkP51EAAeWm8c5mrN1aXEc=
=+La/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061030030636.66af0924>