Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Dec 2013 22:21:58 -0500
From:      Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, Mike Ma <mikemandarine@gmail.com>, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r260091 - in head/sys/cddl: contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys dev/dtrace
Message-ID:  <7A335B4A-D986-4E6E-8D8B-22E7E7991A75@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131231023952.GA11997@charmander.home>
References:  <201312301737.rBUHbW3I035088@svn.freebsd.org> <20131230204210.GD71033@FreeBSD.org> <20131231023952.GA11997@charmander.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Il giorno 30/dic/2013, alle ore 21:40, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> =
ha scritto:

> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:42:10AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 05:37:32PM +0000, Mark Johnston wrote:
>> M> Author: markj
>> M> Date: Mon Dec 30 17:37:32 2013
>> M> New Revision: 260091
>> M> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/260091
>> M>=20
>> M> Log:
>> M>   Now that vmem(9) is available, use vmem arenas to allocate probe =
and
>> M>   aggregation IDs, as is done in the upstream illumos code. This =
still
>> M>   requires some FreeBSD-specific code, as our vmem API is not =
identical to the
>> M>   one in illumos.
>> M>  =20
>> M>   Submitted by:	Mike Ma <mikemandarine@gmail.com>
>>=20
>> IMHO, alloc_unr() was lighter and thus better for allocating just =
IDs.
>=20
> That's true; I committed the change since it helps keep our code =
similar
> to upstream and, as Pedro notes, it was a long-standing todo item on =
the
> wiki. After doing some testing, it looks like vmem is a bit slower:
> process startup is on the order of tenths of milliseconds longer with
> this change, for executables containing one USDT probe (since such
> probes are allocated during process startup).
>=20
> So probably the right thing to do is revert this change. It doesn't
> actually reduce the upstream diff as much as I'd hoped, anyway.
>=20

Since it is our option to decide, perhaps just keep the vmem version as =
reference and #ifdef FreeBSD alloc_unr() ?

I don=92t think we need to keep most of those SUN defines anymore.

Pedro.




> Thanks,
> -Mark




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7A335B4A-D986-4E6E-8D8B-22E7E7991A75>