Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:01:05 -0000 (GMT) From: "David Jenkins" <david.jenkins@gmail.com> To: "Bill Moran" <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple router ? Message-ID: <47606.194.168.3.18.1101747665.squirrel@194.168.3.18> In-Reply-To: <20041129113729.64d8c3ae.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <41AB3354.4010302@esiee.fr> <20041129093917.222ccad8.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200411291844.36416.ostap@radiant.ru> <20041129100506.29d2da5f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <45624.194.168.3.18.1101745265.squirrel@194.168.3.18> <20041129113729.64d8c3ae.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 29 November, 2004 16:37, Bill Moran said: > "David Jenkins" <david.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote: >> There have been quite a lot of threads in the past month regarding >> the >> network performance of 5.3 being inferior to 4.10. >> >> You might also want to bear in mind that with the 5 series you have >> the benefit of OpenBSD's pf firewall. Although more information on >> 4.x >> and pf is available at the following link. >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2004-September/000300.html >> >> Personally, if it was me, I'd go with 5.x rather than 4.x, but if >> you >> are going to be pushing a lot of data then perhaps search the >> archives >> for the last month or two regarding network performance. > > I'm not sure if this is 100% correct anymore. I seem to remember that > the performance problems were in 5.3BETA and were fixed prior to the > release of 5.3-RELEASE. > > I'm willing to be corrected if I'm wrong, but I think research of > reliable sources would be smart. This is quite interesting. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/064401.html And specifically. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/064427.html Cheers, David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47606.194.168.3.18.1101747665.squirrel>