Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 16:53:35 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com>, drifter@stratos.net Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any one still use UUCP? Message-ID: <19980509165335.A2181@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980509005935.26008A-100000@fnur.3skel.com>; from Dan Janowski on Sat, May 09, 1998 at 01:07:09AM -0400 References: <199805082155.RAA00455@stratos.net> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980509005935.26008A-100000@fnur.3skel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 09, 1998 at 01:07:09AM -0400, Dan Janowski wrote: > The best use that I have made of it is UUCP over TCP for > scheduled mail transfers. Folks without a dedicated line and > who don't want a dailup going up and down for each bit of mail > sent out can benefit from UUCP's queuing and scheduling. It > is also better than the sendmail domain queue run directive. Agreed. My internet provider is a true ISP and I'm really happy that I can get News and Mail batched via UUCP. > The current sendmail with the uucp-dom mailer does great > re-writing of addresses in the user@domain style without > getting and !'s. Yes, no problem here ! Much better setting up true batch mode than to fiddle around with mail queues and such ... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980509165335.A2181>