Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:46:20 +0100 From: Jonas Bulow <jonas.bulow@servicefactory.se> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kqueue microbenchmark results Message-ID: <3A3504DC.9273A77A@servicefactory.se> References: <20001024225637.A54554@prism.flugsvamp.com> <39F6655A.353FD236@alumni.caltech.edu> <20001025115457.X28123@fw.wintelcom.net> <20001025170117.C87091@prism.flugsvamp.com> <20001207154925.A25785@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <3A30E115.CF7C76E8@newsguy.com> <3A31120E.3536F07D@alumni.caltech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Kegel wrote: ... > Don't jump to conclusions. He's honestly trying to > understand what the optimal interface would be. > Let him catch up. Help him understand the requirements > which motivated the kqueue design and why his proposed > system call does not meet them. > > His role right now is to keep the kernel as simple as possible. > You need to prove that his proposed interface is simpler than possible :-) A simple way to keep the kernel simple: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-09-013-20-NW-GN-KN :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A3504DC.9273A77A>