Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 05:43:53 -0700 (PDT) From: spam maps <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ? Message-ID: <20041003124353.29822.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
On my cvs-updated 5.3 system I have /stand/ and
/rescue/.
/rescue/ is updated according to cvsup/makeworld etc.,
but /stand/ is not. Is /stand/ becoming redundant?
Should these two directories be merged into a single
/rescue/?
I notice following differences. Files and directories
that are in /stand/, but not in /rescue/:
/rescue/-sh
/rescue/arp
/rescue/boot_crunch
/rescue/cpio
/rescue/find
/rescue/minigzip
/rescue/ppp
/rescue/sed
/rescue/sysinstall
/rescue/usbd
/rescue/usbdevs
/rescue/etc/
/rescue/help/
Moreover, for those files that are in both, the
/stand/
ones are obviously older than the ones (from cvsup
process) in /rescue/.
Regards,
Rob.
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041003124353.29822.qmail>