Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Gareth Hughes <gareth@nvidia.com>
Cc:        Andy Ritger <ARitger@nvidia.com>
Subject:   RE: NVIDIA and TLS
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0306161604330.19977-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D32959E172B8F4D9B02F68266BE421401A6D7D3@mail-sc-3.nvidia.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Gareth Hughes wrote:

> > (that too is of course non portable too but.....)
> 
> Wine uses %fs.
> 

can wine use OpenGL?

Doesn't look like a clash to me.  :-)

what DOES make sense however is to support the __thread
concept, in a way that is efficient as it is not specific to one 
rather esoteric application. I for one have no objection to making
sweeping changes if it looks as if __thread is going to solve problems
for large numbers of applications.
(though they may not be posix complient applications, it probably makes
sense to support it if there are enough of them breaking the same
rules.)





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0306161604330.19977-100000>