Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 09:59:07 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@blueberry.co.uk> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? Message-ID: <19970514095907.40722@blueberry.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199705140805.BAA03496@rah.star-gate.com>; from Amancio Hasty on Wed, May 14, 1997 at 01:05:50AM -0700 References: <33796260.1A2C@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> <199705140805.BAA03496@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 14, 1997 at 01:05:50AM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> What I am pitching is for is that if Thot is good we can start advertising it
> and hopefully standardize our internal documentation based on its format.
> Internal documentation meaning things like : reports, articles, etc...
Um, whos internal documentation?
Yours (as in, your own personal stuff), or the FreeBSD project's (articles,
FAQ, Handbook and so on).
If the latter, what's wrong with DocBook, particularly with John Fieber's
first cut at tutorial documentation at
http://fallout.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber/docbook/markupguide.html
Or have I got the wrong end of the stick, and you can use Thot to write
DocBook markup (at which point the masses start screaming "Emacs + psgml"
:-) )
N
--
--+=[ Blueberry Hill Blueberry New Media ]=+--
--+=[ http://www.blueberry.co.uk/ 1/9 Chelsea Harbour Design Centre, ]=+--
--+=[ WebMaster@blueberry.co.uk London, England, SW10 0XE ]=+--
--+=[ Those who do not read Dilbert are doomed to repeat it ]ENTP
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970514095907.40722>