Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:23:46 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Ports failing with bsd make Message-ID: <200501022323.57457.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20050102215420.GC60857@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <200501022117.48924.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200501022250.38634.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20050102215420.GC60857@voodoo.oberon.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sunday, 2. January 2005 22:54, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:50:33PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Sunday, 2. January 2005 22:23, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:17:44PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > > On recent -current, several ports are failing to build. Common > > > > quality: They all use the system make rather than gmake. > > > > > > > > Examples: science/hdf, textproc/Wordnet, devel/qmake. > > > > > > > > The errors all look pretty similar: > > > > > > > > ===> mfhdf/nctest (all) > > > > make: don't know how to make nctest.1. Stop > > > > ... > > > > > > > > make: don't know how to make wn.1. Stop > > > > ... > > > > > > > > make: don't know how to make qmake.1. Stop > > > > > > > > Looks like they're all failing while trying to generate manpages. Has > > > > make become allergic to targets with a dot in them perhaps? > > > > > > Ruslan's NO_* change broke a lot of ports. He's currently on vacation > > > for a few days, but I expect he'll fix these when he gets back. If > > > you want to do it in the meantime (although we're in ports freeze > > > anyway so this won't be committed until after), the port needs to set > > > *both* NOMAN and NO_MAN (similarly for any other options like NOSHARED > > > and NOPROFILE), for compatibility with both 6.x and older. > > > > Hm - none of those ports set either NO_MAN or NOMAN at the moment (and > > isn't this a base-system switch?). Is my build environment wonky? > > They're defined in software makefiles. LOL - I didn't think that the other common thing of those ports would matter here, but it actually does - they're all made by mi@ and he used a bsd.prog.mk-based custom build system for all of them, too. I guess he got all the pointyhat mail already. :-) -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB2HR9Xhc68WspdLARAgWWAJ0Yql8A9Pt+Yk3PEQSfDFrDWNYZGwCggnDx 1NOerJ2kgUffNBiLqBJWPwU= =XcJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501022323.57457.michaelnottebrock>