Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Apr 1995 16:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
To:        nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Cc:        rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, terry@cs.weber.edu, kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject:   Re: new install(1) utility
Message-ID:  <199504042336.QAA04227@ref.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: <199504042323.RAA07968@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 4, 95 05:23:08 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I wonder if this is the case for non-x86 machines as well, since I
> suspect memcpy() uses the fast string routines available on x86
> machines.

The trick is that you use page-faults instead of read() to get to the
file.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504042336.QAA04227>